Review process
To ensure that trainees have the best experience in the BSc (Med) Program, all research proposals are reviewed independently by two established investigators from the University of Manitoba. These reviewers prepare a joint commentary for the Undergraduate Research Program’s Review Committee. The committee then meets to discuss all submitted projects. Some projects will be accepted as is, others will need further review and responses to questions from the reviewers, and some may be deemed unsuitable and rejected.
Evaluation criteria
Research projects for the BSc (Med) Program are evaluated based on:
- Scientific merit: The overall scientific value of the project.
- Feasibility: Whether the project can be completed by a student over two summers.
- Educational value: The learning benefits of the research experience.
- Supervision quality: The expected quality of supervision and the research environment.
Outcomes
After evaluation, projects will receive one of three outcomes:
- Accepted: No further information or clarification needed.
- Needs more information: Neither accepted nor rejected; additional details are required.
- Rejected: The project is not suitable. The committee will suggest alternatives such as finding a new project or supervisor, or continuing outside the BSc (Med) Program.
Once a project is completely rejected, it cannot be revised and resubmitted in the same year. However, if the supervisor wishes, the project can be revised and resubmitted for the next intake year.
Options for rejected projects
If your project is rejected, you may:
- Proceed independently: Continue with the project outside the Undergraduate Research Program, but note that it won’t count towards the BSc (Med) degree.
- Submit an alternative project: Choose a new project and submit it by the deadline. This new project can be with the same investigator or a different approved investigator.