Embodied Stories: Conserving Vernacular Fragility amid Natural Disasters   

Can architecture intervene and act as a protective skin amid calamity to preserve the self? Familiar spaces for human beings can often evoke feelings of security, comfort, refuge and protection. In The Body Keeps the Score Bessel van der Kolk indicates, “scared animals return home, regardless of whether home is safe or frightening.”1 For many home was the first understanding of physical space manifesting security from the outer unfamiliar world. Throughout our lives, spaces are where intimate stories and memories reside. The inner world is projected outward creating an atmospheric space of the ego within the building envelope.2 This atmosphere of subjective reality, memory, and artifacts is reminiscent of individual existence, and the amalgamation of shared realities.3  

Architecture is a spatial projection of the human body. Like architecture, the human body embodies the inner self and through various layers of skin, muscle and bone acts to protect the self from physical threats. However, like the human body, many natural threats expose the permeability of the building and its inhabitants. In calamity, the fragility of architecture is consequently felt physiologically, metaphysically and psychologically as there is a threat to the preservation of self, the human body and mere existence.  

Sheltering has been consistent throughout time. This is evident in Jamaica where vernacular homes are passed down generationally for protection. Natural disasters have been consistent throughout Jamaica’s history altering the landscape and built-realm.4 The magnitude, scale and force of hydrometeorological events fluctuate throughout time where homes in poorer low-land communities malfunction in its midst.5 Additive architecture can reinforce the promise of sheltering and mutualistically react to the physical vulnerabilities of a building against lateral mass and forces. This may have the capacity to preserve memories, reverse entropic processes and reduce mortality due to building collapse and catapulted debris in the cataclysmic aftermath.6 

Suppose protection and sheltering always reside in the built realm, despite reckless threats. Does architecture have the potential to function systematically like any organism with the primary function of protecting its internal systems and host? If so, does architecture have the capacity to react more organically to unpredictable threats and repair itself accordingly? If the I threat could be reduced through reinforcing and retrofitting familiar spaces that “scared [humans] return to”7 when a natural disaster occurs. A sense of safety can be restored and the familiar space continues to act as a physical boundary from outer world threats.  

Inevitably hurricanes, floods and seismic activity are recurring and ongoing yearly in many countries. For years natural disasters have torn through the architectural fabric while eroding and rupturing the landscape. Therefore, the architectural intention is to create a responsive additive system with the function of conserving the existing context. The objective is that utilizing both the existing landscape and architecture will create a first line of defence that optimizes existing resources to minimize an ongoing threat, instead of rebuilding and erasing the enriched socio-cultural aspects of the society, preserving the self and human existence.