Submission requirements
Please review the Research Ethic Board (REB) submission requirements and deadline dates to ensure your protocol will be reviewed in the month it is submitted. Note: Only electronic submissions will be accepted.
IMPORTANT INFORMATION: As of July 2, 2025, all Health Research will be reviewed by the CHIPER, the provincial health research ethics board. CHIPER is part of the RITHIM (Research Improvements Through Harmonization In Manitoba) program - an initiative that streamlines and harmonizes the process and reviews for health research in 3 key areas: ethics, privacy, and health institutional assessment reviews. Please review the routing questions at www.rithim.ca/harmony-routing to determine whether your project falls under RITHIM's jurisdiction. Researchers may also complete a RITHIM Consultation Form to obtain a determination regarding the requirement for review in RITHIM Harmony.
If your project falls outside of RITHIM's mandate, it will be reviewed by the University of Manitoba REBs. Visit their website for information on their submission requirements.
For previously reviewed or approved protocols only: Over the course of the next few months, the Bannatyne Ethics Office will continue to process ethics submissions on behalf of CHIPER including Responses to Initial Reviews, Amendments, Annual Reports, Study Closures, Adverse Event and Safety Data Reports, and Protocol Deviation Reports. Updates on process changes will be ongoing throughout the summer.
Questions for RITHIM? Visit their website or email CHIPER.
Questions for the University of Manitoba REBs? Email the Office of Human Research Ethics.
On this page:
- Submission tips
- Initial review requirements
- Meeting dates and submission deadlines
- New submissions
- Response to tabled letters
- Response to conditional approval
- Protocol amendments or changes to study
- Change in study personnel and contact information
- Request for preliminary access to grant funding
- Annual review procedures
- Study closure and termination
- Protocol deviations
- Adverse event reporting
Submission tips
Tips for submitting ethics forms
- Ethics applications forms and templates for consent forms undergo regular updating. Always use the current forms found on the web pages of the REBs.
- Ensure all questions are completed on the forms rather than referencing pages in the protocol, as this ensures ease of review by REB members and staff.
- All documents must be given a new version date when revisions are made to study documents.
- Older versions will not be accepted for review.
- Fillable PDF Form Tips
Tips for consent templates
- Ensure lay simple language is used and all acronyms are spelled on first use. Reading level should be at approximately Grade 7.
- Ensure consistency between submission, protocol and supporting documents ( e.g. timing of and length of visits, procedures, etc.).
- Review consent forms to ensure only applicable wording is included in version submitted to Research Ethics Board..
- The bold and underlined portions in the consent templates are for ease of use only. Please remember to remove them from the Informed Consent Forms before submitting them.
- If multiple consent forms are used ensure each is labelled as to target population or procedures (e.g. Genetic Consent Form, Focus Group Consent Form, Patient Consent Form, Control Consent Form, etc).
Protocols
All submissions should include a full protocol that discusses the applicable scientific and ethical aspects of the study.
Aspects of protocol writing and templates
With all submissions, we suggest that you include a full protocol that discusses the applicable scientific and ethical aspects of the study as outlined here.
The scientific aspects of the protocol should include a discussion of:
- the research problem, background analysis and hypothesis
- the relevant literature including animal and adult literature (where appropriate)
- study objectives
- the research design and methodology, such as inclusion or exclusion criteria, sample size or justification of statistical methods for assessing results
- a schematic timeline when the protocol proposes multiple interventions or multiple time points
- definition of adverse and serious adverse events
- all studies requiring a Health Canada Applications (CTAs) must include details on monitoring duties
- details on safety plans
- detailed data management plans to ensure security of data during storage and sharing of research data
- budget details and available resources
- contract with sponsor, when available
The ethical aspects of the protocol should include a discussion of:
- potential benefits to participants and others
- potential harms to participants and others
- alternative treatments or procedures
- how potential harms will be minimized, including the risk of breach of privacy and confidentiality
- the process for seeking consent and assent
Initial review requirements
Before submitting submissions for new studies, please review RITHIM's routing questions to determine whether your project falls under their jurisdiction.
If your project falls outside of RITHIM's mandate, it will be reviewed by the University of Manitoba REBs. Visit their website for information on their submission requirements. If you have any questions, email the Office of Human Research Ethics.
Meeting dates and submission deadlines
Submission and meeting dates are tentative and subject to change. Adjustments may be required to enable the full launch of RITHIM and the alignment of impact, privacy and ethics reviews.
New submissions
Before submitting submissions for new studies, please review RITHIM's routing questions to determine whether your project falls under their jurisdiction.
If your project falls outside of RITHIM's mandate, it will be reviewed by the University of Manitoba REBs. Visit their website for information on their submission requirements. If you have any questions, email the Office of Human Research Ethics.
Response to tabled letters
Tabled submissions require the review of the full committee. Use the instructions below to correctly format and submit your tabled response.
1. Review the board meeting deadlines
The deadline for the response to a research protocol that has been previously reviewed and tabled by the Research Ethics Board is three weeks prior to the meeting dates as listed above.
2. Prepare your tabled response
All additional documents presented for review/approval must include a version date.
- Summarize the revisions and provide clarification to the issues outlined in response to each bullet of the Research Ethics Board (REB) conditional approval letter in a cover letter.
- Cite the full title and ethics reference number of your study on the Tabled Response Letter.
- Provide electronic copies of the revised portions of your study.
- Revisions must be highlighted so they can be identified in the text of the revised documents (for example, any deleted text should have a strikethrough and new text bolded or underlined).
- All revised documents will require a new version date. Note that for Informed Consent Forms this must be updated in the footer of each page.
- Final approval will be delayed if the dates are not corrected.
3. Submit electronically
- Send the response to the bannreb@umanitoba.ca only. Do not send it to any of the REB staff’s personnel email accounts.
- In the Subject line of the email enter the following information as applicable to the submission:
Ethics HS # (followed by HREB or BREB #) tabled response
Response to conditional approval
If the initial review was not tabled, there is no deadline for submitting your response. Follow these instructions when preparing your response for conditional approval.
1. Prepare your response of conditional approval
All additional documents presented for review/approval must include a version date.
- Summarize the revisions and provide clarification to the issues outlined in response to each bullet of the REB conditional approval letter in a cover letter.
- Cite the full title and ethics reference number of your project in the Letter of Response.
- Provide electronic copies of the revised portions of your study Revisions must be highlighted so they can be identified in the text of the revised documents (for example, deleted text should have a strike through and new text bolded or underlined).
- All revised documents will require a new version date. For Informed Consent Forms, this must be updated in the footer of each page.
- Final approval will be delayed if the dates are not corrected.
2. Submit electronically
- Send the response to the bannreb@umanitoba.ca only. Do not send it to any of the REB staff’s personnel email accounts.
- In the subject line of the email enter the following information as applicable for to the submission:
Ethics HS # (followed by HREB or BREB #) RESPONSE to Conditional approval
- In the subject line for COVID-19 biological clinical trials, enter the following information:
COVID - Ethics HS # (followed by HREB or BREB #) RESPONSE to Conditional approval
Protocol amendments or changes to study
If the researcher or sponsor recognizes the need for modification to the protocol or proposal, they are obliged to file a protocol amendment with the REB prior to implementing the change.
Amendments or changes to an approved protocol
Researchers are obliged to follow the procedures outlined in the protocol or proposal approved by the Research Ethics Board (REB).
If the researcher or sponsor recognizes the need for modification to the protocol or proposal, they are obliged to file a protocol amendment with the REB prior to implementing the change.
This guideline outlines:
- The necessary information that is required of the applicant when submitting a request to the REB
- Details of the operating procedures of the Bannatyne Campus REBs review process related to amendments.
Examples of amendments that require REB review include, but are not limited to, changes in:
- key personnel, such as principal investigators, co-investigators, study physicians
- research protocol objectives
- advertising materials, such as flyers, radio spots
- research procedures
- participant populations, such as age range
- location where research will be conducted
- consent or assent form
- recruitment procedures
- date for completion of study
- procedures for monitoring safety data
Tips when submitting amendments or changes to a protocol
- Complete and review the Bannatyne Campus REB Submission Requirement Checklists for Amendments, Additions or Changes to Approved Studies Delegated Review or Full Board Review.
- All changes, with the exception of changes in personnel, must be submitted on the Amendment Form.
- For changes in study personnel, complete the Change in Study Personnel Amendment Form (PDF). A checklist of required documents is outlined on the form.
- IMPORTANT: Review consent forms to ensure new required language for Data and Biological sharing is updated as applicable to the study.
- Additions to amended documents must be underlined or in bold text and any deletions indicated by strikethrough.
- Remember to revise the version date in the footer of each page of amended consent forms or title page on supporting documents.
When are No Objection Letters (NOL's) required for amendments?
If a No Objection Letter (NOL) from Health Canada was received for the initiation of the clinical trial, then a copy of the NOL from Health Canada for proposed changes to the protocol must be submitted before the REB will approve the proposed amendment or an appropriate justification from the sponsor is outlined in the submission.
- Review Submission and Review Procedures for Amendment/Changes to Previously Approved Study to determine the level of review required — full board or delegated.
- Review submission deadline dates if full board review is required. Amendments that meet the criteria for delegated review can be submitted at any time.
- Prepare your submission using the amendment form and appropriate checklist.
- Send the Amendment to the bannreb@umanitoba.ca email address. Do not send it to any of the REB staff’s personnel email accounts. Enter the following information in the subject line of the email as applicable to whether it is a delegated or full board review.
Ethics HS # (followed by HREB or BREB #) Amendment – full board
or
Ethics HS # (followed by HREB or BREB #) Amendment – delegated
Checklists and Forms
Change in study personnel and contact information
Changes to personnel and contact information will be reviewed in a delegated manner by the Research Ethics Board (REB) Chair and/or REB Coordinator when appropriate. Certificates of approval are only issued if there is a change in the Principal Investigator.
The University of Manitoba requires that all research personnel involved in the collection and review of research data complete the online TCPS 2 CORE tutorial.
Complete the Change in Study Personnel Amendment form and follow instructions for submitting via e-mail for amendments.
Change in Study Personnel Amendment Form (PDF)
Annual review procedures
All research studies, databases, registries or specimen repositories that received initial approval from a Bannatyne campus Research Ethics Board (REB) must be resubmitted for annual approval to the appropriate REB no later than four weeks prior to the expiry date noted on the initial certificate of final approval. This includes all research studies, databases or specimen repositories that may be closed to accrual or enrolment and/or where there is an ongoing follow-up of study participants, such as the continued collection of mortality or morbidity information related to the initial study, research databases or registries.
Studies that do not involve participant participation, such as secondary use of data, must be submitted for renewal up until the point that the data acquisition is completed. Local research databases or registries or specimen repositories should submit an application for annual approval up until the point the data or specimens are destroyed.
The Bannatyne campus REB office must be notified of closure via the Bannatyne campus Research Ethics Board Final Study Status Report of any study previously submitted for ethical review regardless of whether the study received final approval or not.
Process
- Review annual procedures to determine the level of review required — either delegated or full board.
- Review submission deadline dates if a full board review is required. Annual reviews that meet the criteria for delegated review can be submitted at any time.
- Prepare your submission using the appropriate checklist from the HREB/BREB forms.
Submit the request for annual approval 4-6 weeks prior to the expiry date noted on the initial certificate of approval or last annual approval certificate to ensure there is no lapse in approval.
Required HREB/BREB forms
Submit your Annual Study Status Report (ASSR)
All requests for annual approval, including research approved by the HREB and BREB, must be submitted using the Bannatyne Campus Research Ethics Office Annual Study Status Report (ASSR) listed above. Ensure you use this version of the PDF form, as older versions will not be accepted.
Studies requiring Full Board annual review
Send the Annual Review documents and consent forms in use to bannreb@umanitoba.ca only for full board review. Do not send it to any of the REB staff’s personnel e-mail accounts.
Enter the following information as the subject line of your email as applicable:
Ethics HS # (followed by HREB or BREB #) Annual – FULL BOARD
Studies requiring Delegated annual review
Submit your Bannatyne Campus REB ASSR form (signed by PI) and consent forms in use for delegated review to rebassr@umanitoba.ca
Enter the following information as the subject line of your email as applicable:
Ethics HS # (followed by HREB or BREB #) Annual – DELEGATED REVIEW
Only delegated ASSRs will be accepted using the electronic form. Any other submissions (such as new protocols, final reports, amendments, safety reports or protocol deviations) will not be accepted at this e-mail address.
Study closure and termination
All studies must have a Final Study Status Report sent to the REB at the time of study closure as outlined in the guidelines.
Study closure is the time at which data is archived at the local site, or in the case of multi-centre trials, when all data has been transferred to the sponsor after the close-out visit.
The Bannatyne Campus REB office must be notified of closure of any study previously submitted for ethical review regardless of whether the study received final approval or not.
Requirements for notification of premature termination or study closure
The Bannatyne Campus REB office must be notified of closure of any study previously submitted for ethical review regardless of whether the study received final approval or not.
Premature termination or suspension of a trial
If a study is terminated prematurely or suspended for any reason, the Principal Investigator (PI) must promptly inform the REB in writing this suspension; the reasons for the suspension and the appropriate measures in place to assure appropriate therapy and follow-up for the participants; and the procedures considered for notifying the participants. If the reason for suspension is related to an emergent safety issue, the notification should be either faxed to the REB office or preceded by a telephone call to the Chair or REB Coordinator.
The Bannatyne Campus Final Study Status Report is also required at the time the sponsor conducts the close-out visit as indicated below:
Multi-centre studies
The local site may close if there are no further implications to local participants even though the study continues in other sites. For industry-sponsored studies, a Final Study Status Report should only be submitted to the REB office after the sponsor has conducted the close-out visit. If the sponsor has no plans to conduct a close-out visit, the Final Study Status Report must be submitted after all data clarifications have been completed and the sponsor has indicated to the Principal Investigator (PI) that study files can be archived for long term storage.
Local single-centre studies
A Final Study Status Report must be submitted to the REB office after the study when all study-related activities including long-term follow-up of data are completed.
For studies that do not involve direct participant participation for example, secondary use of data, a Final Study Status Report can be submitted when data acquisition is completed.
In some cases if the study is receiving funding there may be a requirement to keep the study file open while funds are being accessed. It also is suggested the study file remain open during the initial data analysis for potential first publication should journal editors request additional information. This will facilitate the review of the amendment by the Research Ethics Board to collect this additional information.
For local registries or research databases, a Final Study Status Report must only be submitted after the database is destroyed or there is no intent to access the dataset in the future for research purposes.
Acknowledgement of receipt
The Research Ethics Board office will process the Final Study Status Form and an email will be sent when the report is uploaded to our system. Please keep this for your records.
There is no regulatory requirement for acknowledgment of notices re: study closure or premature termination.
The REB will not send an initialed report to the site.
Posting of clinical trial results
To facilitate transparency of study results, the University of Manitoba is strongly encouraging that all clinical trial study results are posted on a publicly accessible results website within six to 12 months of study completion.
Submit your Final Study Status Report Form (FSSR)
Submit a completed and signed copy of the Final Study Status Report to the REB Bannatyne office to rebfssr@umanitoba.ca
This document must be completed for all studies regardless of whether the project is a clinical trial or not.
Please ensure you are using the most current version of the FSSR. Older versions will be returned to the researcher.
Download the Final Study Status Form (PDF)
Only FSSRs will be accepted via this format. Any other submissions (such as new protocols, annual reviews, amendments, safety reports, protocol deviations, etc.) will not be accepted at this e-mail address.
Protocol deviations
Protocol deviations and privacy breach reporting
As per ICH GCP 4.5.2, "The investigator should not implement any deviation from, or changes of the protocol without agreement by the sponsor and prior review and documented approval/favourable opinion from the IRB/IEC of an amendment, except where necessary to eliminate an immediate hazard(s) to trial subjects, or when the change(s) involves only logistical or administrative aspects of the trial (e.g., change in monitor(s), change of telephone number(s).
A protocol deviation is defined as any action or inaction that does not correspond to the approved protocol. A protocol deviation may include accidental/unintentional or intentional changes, including changes made to eliminate an immediate hazard to participants or others. Protocol deviations may be major or minor and serious or not serious.
All protocol deviations (both minor and major) for all research projects, that is, clinical trials, observational studies, retrospective records review, registries, biobanks and others that had not received prior approval by a Bannatyne Campus Research Ethics Board through an amendment, must be reported to the Bannatyne Campus REB office as per the guidelines.
As we develop more detailed requirements for reporting privacy breaches or confidentiality breaches, please report such as a protocol deviation on the Major Protocol Deviation Form.
Protocol deviation reporting forms
Adverse event reporting
Review the University of Manitoba Bannatyne Campus Research Ethics Board's procedures relating to the reporting of adverse events and safety information.