What’s the Issue?
Sustainability is a loaded word. It often turns up when people are discussing what might be wrong with the Canadian healthcare system. In general terms, “sustainability” describes the ability to maintain something at a certain level through conservation or defence. In Canada’s healthcare debate, “sustainability” can trigger a heated argument about whether we can afford the level of healthcare people expect at a cost which is acceptable to Canadians and their government(s). But is Canada’s healthcare really at risk of becoming unsustainable?
These discussions are complicated because we usually aren’t told what is causing the concern: which costs are rising (e.g. public or private), what is being compared (e.g. absolute cost increases or cost increases as a percent of gross national product) and how health costs relate to other financial developments (e.g. is the economy growing or shrinking).
There is also confusion about what proportion of government spending is taken up by healthcare. This is affected not only by how much the government spends on healthcare, but also by how much it spends (or doesn’t) in other areas. For instance, if the government decides to cut back spending on education or police services, then healthcare spending—even if it remains unchanged—will account for a larger percentage of the provincial budget.
So instead of worrying about the unsustainability of healthcare, Canadians should be asking how the numbers are moving relative to other factors such as: private health spending, gross domestic product, government spending in other areas, and tax revenues. That’s the way to sustain an informed discussion on sustainability.
Read Executive Summary
- Rex Murphy of CBC’s Cross Country Check Up interviews Dr. Ben Chan about physician supply challenges and whether it is time to rethink the role of the physician. Listen to that interview here.
- In October 2013, the Health Council of Canada hosted a National Symposium on Quality Improvement titled Towards a High-Performing Health Care System: The Role of Canada’s Quality Councils. The forum provided an opportunity for senior leaders from across Canada to discuss health system performance measurement and reporting, as well as opportunities for further interprovincial collaboration on quality improvement. The report titled Canada’s Quality Improvement Conundrum is available on the Health Council of Canada’s Website.
- In the report Better health, better care, better value for all: Refocusing health care reform in Canada, the Health Council of Canada builds on the Triple Aim framework and proposes that better health, better care, and better value for all can be achieved through sustained support of five key enablers: (i) leadership, (ii) policies and legislation; (iii) capacity building; (iv) innovation and spread; and (v) measurement and reporting. The report is available in both official languages via the Health Council’s website, www.healthcouncilcanada.ca.
- Which way to quality? Key perspectives on quality improvement in Canadian health care systems, infographic from CIHI. In this report, the Health Council provides a collective view on the quality improvement roles and an at-a-glace snapshot of the variation in those roles among provincial dedicated quality agencies and pan-Canadian Health organizations.
- Aging of the population is often described as tsunami about to swamp our Medicare system. However, various studies for many years have shown that aging of the population per se will add less than 1% a year to healthcare costs. Although the population is aging and the babyboomers are expected to live longer than their predecessors, the increased number of elderly will be small in comparison to Canada’s overall population and consequently their impact on the delivery of healthcare in Canada will also be small. In reality, health cost increases are driven by changes in the quantity and types of healthcare received by Canadians of all ages, not by demographic changes. An aging population does not necessarily threaten the sustainability of Canada’s healthcare system, but it does create a need to ensure we are able to provide seniors with the right care, in the right place, at the right time.
- CIHI (2011) provides a detailed examination of how aging has affected spending growth over the last decade as well a look at the upcoming challenges brought on by Canada’s aging demographics.
- Healthcare spending as a % of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) has increased gradually over the last several decades, showing sharp increases in the recent past and in the early 90’s – reflecting the impact of a recession. Healthcare spending typically goes up as a percentage of overall spending during recessionary times. Public healthcare spending has risen in absolute terms since 1998, although the Canadian growth rate in per capita health expenditures has been lower than the OECD average. Healthcare spending is also taking a greater share of total government spending in recent years. Tax cuts at both the provincial and federal levels have reduced provincial revenues and contributed to pressures on provincial budgets.
- Detailed health expenditures trends from 1975-2011 are available here, while the most important drivers of health care spending is covered in greater depth here.
Our healthcare system designed for the convenience of doctors, not patients
Convocation speech delivered to graduating MDs at the University of Manitoba on the receipt of an honorary doctorate.
Canada has mixed wait time results in healthcare
Wait times have long been a source of concern for Canadians, and in some jurisdictions, remain a significant problem. Recently the Canadian Institutes of Health Information (CIHI) released their report for 2015. There is both encouraging news and areas in need of attention.
Putting healthcare on the federal election agenda
A federal election could be called any time in the next few months, judging by the media coverage and the ramping up of political activity. Many issues have been crowding into the media headlines in anticipation of the election — but with a notable absence of any consideration of healthcare by our political parties.
Double-failing on health
Forty is the new thirty. Orange is the new black. And Failure is the new success.
It seems these days that no success story is complete without a failure (or two) along the way: the bankruptcy that gave birth to a successful company; the entrepreneur who lost it all just before hitting the Fortune 500.