AGING POPULATION
COSTS AND SPENDING
FOR-PROFIT
MORE NOT ALWAYS BETTER
HEALTH MORE THAN HEALTHCARE
PATIENT PAYS
SUSTAINABILITY
WAITING FOR CARE
  • Home
  • About
    • Experts
  • Contact
  • Backgrounders
  • Commentaries
    • English
    • French
  • Our Videos
    • Our Videos
    • Featured Videos
  • Resources

Evidence Network
Skip to content
  • Home
  • About
    • Experts
  • Contact
  • Backgrounders
  • Commentaries
    • English
    • French
  • Our Videos
    • Our Videos
    • Featured Videos
  • Resources
     
Share
Print Friendly and PDF

PatientPays2

Making Patients Pay won’t make the System more Affordable

Some people think that charging patients when they use the health system would help control health care costs and ensure that people were getting the care they need and not overusing the system. Others believe that user fees would bring in much-needed revenue.

Research to date suggests user charges for patients discourage patients from seeking both necessary and unnecessary care. When preventive care is discouraged and effective drug prescriptions are not filled, user charges can promote higher costs and poorer health.

But this doesn’t mean that money is saved. Nature abhors a vacuum, and the health care system detests unused capacity. As a result, any beds or doctors freed up because the sick are discouraged by charges, end up being used by the healthy for care they may not need.

Some claim that user fees are benign because they discourage only frivolous use. However, a US study involving fairly healthy adults showed that user fees led to a 20 per cent increase in risk of death for people with high blood pressure because they were less likely to see a doctor and get their blood pressure under control.1 The same study showed that user fees were just as likely to discourage appropriate care as inappropriate care.2

And, that’s a big problem with user fees. The average person doesn’t know whether their symptom warrants medical attention. When a child has a fever, most parents don’t know whether it’s the flu or the onset of meningitis. Do we really want them to make the decision about whether to seek health care on the basis of whether that will leave enough money to pay the rent?

The scientific evidence supporting publicly financed care is long and strong. So why do discredited ideas like user fees keep coming back? Dr. Bob Evans and his colleagues have repeatedly examined this issue and refer to user fees and related ideas as “zombies.”3 That’s because they have been killed off repeatedly by the scientific evidence, but, just like zombies, they keep bouncing back to life to wreak havoc with our public policy.

References

1. Brook RH, Ware JE, Rogers WH, et al. Does free care improve adults’ health? New England Journal of Medicine, 1983;309:1426–1434.

2. Siu AL, Sonnenberg FA, Manning WG, et al. Inappropriate use of hospitals in a randomized trial of health insurance plans, New England Journal of Medicine, 1986;315:1259–1266; Foxman B, Valdez RB, Lohr KN, et al., The effect of cost sharing on the use of antibiotics in ambulatory care: results from a population-based randomized controlled trial, Journal of Chronic Diseases, 1987;40:429–437.

3. Evans RG, Barer ML, Stoddart GL. User fees for health care: why a bad idea keeps coming back, Canadian Journal on Aging, 1995;360:360–390.

« Back to ‘Patient Financing of Healthcare (The Patient Pays)’ Topic

Our Commentaries

  • Roos_Dispensing fees_14160731
    Beware drug store dispensing fees
    By Noralou Roos
    Ever wonder why we have so many pharmacies around town? It seems as if there’s a new one on every other street corner these days. Some of them seem to have found all sorts of ways of making money from the unwary consumer.
  • Prescription
    Moving to income-based drug coverage is the wrong prescription
    By Steve Morgan
    The Alberta government has announced major pharmacare reforms: the province is planning to move from a system where public drug coverage is available mainly for seniors to a system where coverage will be restricted based upon income. Experience from other provinces suggests that income-based pharmacare will not pan out well for Albertans.
  • Cassels_Drugsalesman_000008441294Small
    Toxic information
    By Alan Cassels
    It sometimes takes a long time to discover environmental hazards, and even longer to do something about them, once discovered.
  • Sharma_Pay as you weigh_Apr_13_11515696
    Pay as you weigh an unfair pricing strategy
    By Arya Sharma
    This week the wires were active with suggestions that people with obesity pay more for airline travel. This discussion was prompted by a Samoan airline announcing that they would begin charging passengers by the pound.

Browse All Commentaries View French Commentaries

Comments are closed.


We have experts who are ready and able to answer questions and connect you with the evidence on issues in Canadian health policy.


We are here to help you quickly make sense of complex health policy issues. We can help you understand what evidence is out there and how to put new evidence into context.

Review the evidence, browse how these topics have been discussed in the news or go directly to our list of health policy experts.



Keep up to date with newly-released press releases and be the first to hear about our updates and new topics.

Editorial: Health system still good value

Times Colonist

Hospital sticker shock

Chicago Tribune

Risky anti-acne drug Diane-35 gets Health Canada OK if used right

Diana Ziomislic.
TheStar.com



AGING POPULATION
COSTS AND SPENDING
MORE NOT ALWAYS BETTER
HEALTH MORE THAN HEALTHCARE
FOR-PROFIT
PATIENT PAYS
SUSTAINABILITY
WAITING FOR CARE


Evidence Network
Proudly powered by WordPress.

  • PRIVACY STATEMENT
  • TERMS OF USE
  • CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY
  • CONTACT
Site development provided in part by:
     Copyright EvidenceNetwork.ca