AGING POPULATION
COSTS AND SPENDING
FOR-PROFIT
MORE NOT ALWAYS BETTER
HEALTH MORE THAN HEALTHCARE
PATIENT PAYS
SUSTAINABILITY
WAITING FOR CARE
  • Home
  • About
    • Contact
  • Experts
  • Backgrounders
  • Commentaries
    • English
    • French
  • Our Videos
    • Our Videos
    • Featured Videos
  • Resources

Evidence Network
Skip to content
  • Home
  • About
    • Contact
  • Experts
  • Backgrounders
  • Commentaries
    • English
    • French
  • Our Videos
    • Our Videos
    • Featured Videos
  • Resources
     
Share
Print Friendly and PDF

Costs5

Tax Cuts and HealthCare Spending

Tables 1 and 2 summarize the estimated 2005-2006 revenue losses from provincial corporate and personal income tax cuts established in provincial budgets between 1995 and 2002 in absolute dollars and as a percentage of actual provincial government revenue in 2005-2006.

Table 1: Corporate Income Tax Cuts

Impact of cuts to 2005-6 (millions of dollars) 2005-6 actual revenue (millions of dollars) Relative impact of cut
Newfoundland and Labrador 0 198 0.0%
Prince Edward Island 2 38 5.3%
Nova Scotia 0 363 0.0%
New Brunswick -73 165 -44.2%
Quebec -1,099 3,667 -30.0%
Ontario -3,978 8,296 -48.0%
Manitoba -81 352 -23.0%
Saskatchewan -39 393 -9.9%
Alberta -565 4,278 -12.0%
British Columbia -461 1,570 -29.4%
TOTAL -6,294 19,770 -31.8%
Sources:  Income tax cuts, by province, budgets between 1996 and 2002 –annual revenue loss, unpublished data, Finance Canada, October 2002. CANSIM Table 385-0001, Statistics Canada, 2010.

For example, Table 1 shows that in British Columbia, corporate income tax cuts introduced in budgets between 1996 and 2002, when fully implemented, reduced the province’s revenue in fiscal year 2005-2006 by an estimated $461 million. That cut represents 29.4% of the province’s actual fiscal year 2005-2006 revenue from corporate income taxes.

Table 2: Personal Income Tax Cuts

Impact of cuts to 2005-6(millions of dollars) 2005-6 actual revenue(millions of dollars) Relative impact of cut
Newfoundland and Labrador -62 821 -7.6%
Prince Edward Island -22 205 -10.7%
Nova Scotia -241 1,565 -15.4%
New Brunswick -269 1,080 -24.9%
Quebec -5,395 19,527 -27.6%
Ontario -12,129 24,291 -49.9%
Manitoba -411 1,941 -21.2%
Saskatchewan -673 1,449 -46.4%
Alberta -2,210 2,889 -76.5%
British Columbia -2,744 5,943 -46.2%
TOTAL -24,155 59,711 -40.5%
Sources:  Income tax cuts, by province, budgets between 1996 and 2002 – annual revenue loss, unpublished data, Finance Canada, October 2002. CANSIM Table 385-0001, Statistics Canada, 2010.

Table 2 shows the estimated annual revenue loss in fiscal year 2005-2006 from personal income tax cuts implemented in budgets between 1996 and 2002. For example, New Brunswick’s personal income tax cuts introduced between 1996 and 2002 reduced the province’s personal income tax revenue by an estimated $269 million in 2005-2006 as compared with actual 2005-2006 personal income tax revenue of $1,080 million.

« Back to ‘Healthcare Costs and Spending’ Topic

Our Commentaries

  • Blurred doctors surgery corridor
    Don’t confuse money with quality at our hospitals
    By Jason M. Sutherland and Nadya Repin
    Many people are willing to pay more for higher quality products. For example, you will be confident that a high quality, brand-name TV will work when you get it home. If it doesn’t, the TV will be replaced free-of-charge.
  • Morgan_Alberta rx_April_13_12731648
    Generic drug prices in Alberta: A step in the right direction
    By Michael Law and Jillian Kratzer
    Want to buy a $100 coffee? Sounds absurd, doesn’t it? However, it’s equally absurd that this is how much more Albertans pay for some generic drugs than people in other countries.
  • blue pills
    How universal pharmacare might just save our health care system
    By Steve Morgan
    When the topic of universal drug coverage comes up in this country, the debate often runs aground on the question of cost. In an environment of government austerity, few seem willing to embrace the idea of a new, national government program.
  • Frank_public health care_Jan 13_7545448
    It’s time to view public health care as an economic asset
    By Cy Frank
    The road to reviving Canada’s sluggish productivity may lead straight to an emergency department — or an operating room — or an immunization clinic.

Browse All Commentaries View French Commentaries

Comments are closed.


We have experts who are ready and able to answer questions and connect you with the evidence on issues in Canadian health policy.


We are here to help you quickly make sense of complex health policy issues. We can help you understand what evidence is out there and how to put new evidence into context.

Review the evidence, browse how these topics have been discussed in the news or go directly to our list of health policy experts.



Keep up to date with newly-released press releases and be the first to hear about our updates and new topics.

Editorial: Health system still good value

Times Colonist

Hospital sticker shock

Chicago Tribune

Risky anti-acne drug Diane-35 gets Health Canada OK if used right

Diana Ziomislic.
TheStar.com



AGING POPULATION
COSTS AND SPENDING
MORE NOT ALWAYS BETTER
HEALTH MORE THAN HEALTHCARE
FOR-PROFIT
PATIENT PAYS
SUSTAINABILITY
WAITING FOR CARE


Evidence Network
Proudly powered by WordPress.

  • PRIVACY STATEMENT
  • TERMS OF USE
  • CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY
  • CONTACT
Site development provided in part by:
     Copyright EvidenceNetwork.ca